Atkins Diet is dangerous pseudo-science
Aug. 13th, 2003 11:51 amThe Atkins Diet is a pile of dangerous pseudo-science. Not that this comes as a surprise, but here's the word from Dr Susan Jebb of the Medical Research Council's Human Nutrition Research Centre.
(Note: questions about TrustFlow here will be deleted, post them in
trustmetrics.)
Update: Post made friends-only. Thanks to
babysimon for pointing out that
vampwillow had invited people in
atkins_uk to join the thread, resulting in some incredibly lunatic contributions. Update: Public again.
(Note: questions about TrustFlow here will be deleted, post them in
Update: Post made friends-only. Thanks to
linked comments 3
Date: 2003-08-15 02:46 am (UTC)yup your mind is truly open to new things, as open as I don’t know the bible no, no wait the Koran. A mind so open that actually doing some research before commenting is not required. A mind so open to other possibilities that its owner merely spouts hearsay and nth hand information from ‘establishment’ sources. A mind that assumes that others are just like them and that it never occurred to us to look at all the data, that we could never have read research papers on the issues before starting down the Atkins route, that for example it wouldn’t occur to us to do what Atkins asks and to get regular blood tests. And of course all those laboratories around the world are part of some global conspiracy to foist the lie that Atkins works when they report back reduced triglyceride levels, lower levels of VLDL and LDL cholesterol, whilst rising level of HDL, of good blood iron levels, good Liver Function Tests, to doctors who whilst initially sceptical watch as there patients lose weight from life threatening levels to normal body weight.
The same patients who for years have fought to reduce or just maintain their weight on diets that fit the ‘standard’ pyramid of foods. I say ‘standard’ because it different in different countries and has been changed every 10 years or so to become the new established Truth. 20+ years ago the truth was that bread and potatoes were the best and fat was bad, 10+ years ago it was that bread and potatoes weren’t so good and that complex vegetables that was good and that it was fat that should be taken in very small amounts, Now its that some fats such as Olive oils are good and should be taken in reasonable amounts but saturated, trans and hydrogenated fats should be avoided – the sort of fats found in most margarine’s. But hey the establishment or at least the bits of the establishment that everybody has been quoting still hold to the idea that fat equals bad carbs equal good.
Perhaps you should try doing opening your mind through research before you try to comment on the openness of other people commenting here
Re: linked comments 3
Date: 2003-08-15 03:05 am (UTC)Re: linked comments 3
Date: 2003-08-15 04:11 am (UTC)I admit i relied on a friend to my most of my reasearch I tried it out for a week to see if it helped, I have subsquenstly read and researched numerous papers because I have met a barrage of ill thought out hearsay based on little or no research. I have also found that Atkins worked for me - and that there is strong scientific evidance to back up the theories about how it works
Re: linked comments 3
Date: 2003-08-15 06:36 am (UTC)i haven't commented on this area. i have looked at both sides of the discussion, and come to conclusions. the one that makes most sense to me is that atkins is a diet, like many others. it's no better, no worse than any other diet.
Re: linked comments 3
Date: 2003-08-15 07:50 am (UTC)Hmm, anyway, reminds me of the 'tards from
I know you conduct yourself too professionally to stoop to saying that yourself, so I hope you don't mind me taking this potshot for you ;) - unter
Bitchy mode: Disengaged
Re: linked comments 3
Date: 2003-08-15 08:29 am (UTC)no, man, i don't mind you taking potshots... not sure you needed to do it anonymously though... :)