ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
The Atkins Diet is a pile of dangerous pseudo-science. Not that this comes as a surprise, but here's the word from Dr Susan Jebb of the Medical Research Council's Human Nutrition Research Centre.

(Note: questions about TrustFlow here will be deleted, post them in [livejournal.com profile] trustmetrics.)

Update: Post made friends-only. Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] babysimon for pointing out that [livejournal.com profile] vampwillow had invited people in [livejournal.com profile] atkins_uk to join the thread, resulting in some incredibly lunatic contributions. Update: Public again.

Date: 2003-08-13 07:12 am (UTC)
vampwillow: thinking (thinker)
From: [personal profile] vampwillow
There is a massive difference of substance between 'encouraging a bad diet' and 'not promoting a better diet'. Similarly, I'm not saying that something is done 'in return for memo pads' but that pharma companies would not engage in the substantial advertising and 'marketing' to end-prescribers (ie doctors) that they do if they did not believe they would increase their income from such activities.

If there was nothing in it for the pharma industry to place their product names in such locations they would not take part in such an activity. The fact that they do, and with such a high level of activitity, clearly demonstrates that they feel such an activity is financially beneficial to them.

Pharma companies make money, pay taxes, make products on which users pay additional taxes.

Basic foodstuffs (meat, fish, cheese) in this country and vat-free and do not represent additional income for the government.

The government funds various organisations for 'public' purposes.

You do the math!

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 07:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios