Atkins Diet is dangerous pseudo-science
Aug. 13th, 2003 11:51 amThe Atkins Diet is a pile of dangerous pseudo-science. Not that this comes as a surprise, but here's the word from Dr Susan Jebb of the Medical Research Council's Human Nutrition Research Centre.
(Note: questions about TrustFlow here will be deleted, post them in
trustmetrics.)
Update: Post made friends-only. Thanks to
babysimon for pointing out that
vampwillow had invited people in
atkins_uk to join the thread, resulting in some incredibly lunatic contributions. Update: Public again.
(Note: questions about TrustFlow here will be deleted, post them in
Update: Post made friends-only. Thanks to
I'd heard a different story
Date: 2003-08-13 04:11 am (UTC)Of course it could all be a cover up.
Re: I'd heard a different story
Date: 2003-08-13 04:16 am (UTC)Atkins claimed that the heart attack was due to infection and not related to diet.
However, it's pretty well established that high cholestrol diets like the Atkins diet lead to an early heart attack. ISTR a remark from one doctor along the lines of "it's like recommending someone take up smoking in order to lose weight".
Re: I'd heard a different story
Date: 2003-08-13 04:20 am (UTC)Needless to say the minute his GP found out he was advised to stop.
Re: I'd heard a different story
Date: 2003-08-13 04:36 am (UTC)Re: I'd heard a different story
Date: 2003-08-13 04:41 am (UTC)source??
sfaiaa the issue is that it is only if there are high levels of carbohydrates AS WELL that this may be an issue. There are two basic types of cholestrol (effecticely one good one bad) and going through the four stages of Atkins generally reduces the bad and improves the good. Plenty of sources on file for that, including many postings of people reporting tests on themselves on the Atkins LJ communities.
Re: I'd heard a different story
Date: 2003-08-13 06:52 am (UTC)Only members of The Conspiracy To Keep People Ill believe this, ie the NHS, American Heart Association, US National Institute of Health and practicaly the entire medical profession. It's disputed by that well-known authority Dr Uffe Ravnskov.
Re: I'd heard a different story
Date: 2003-08-13 07:13 am (UTC)Re: I'd heard a different story
Date: 2003-08-13 10:40 am (UTC)