ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
I may not reply to everything in that 159-comment thread but thanks to everyone who participated. I hope people don't mind if I carry on asking for your help in thinking about this. I might post articles on specific areas people raised, but first I thought to ask this: my Google-fu may be failing me. I'd appreciate any links anyone can find to good articles arguing against signing up for cryonics, or pointing out flaws in arguments made for cryosuspension. I don't mean South Park, thanks :-) I'm looking for something that really intends to be persuasive.

thanks again!

Update: here's some I've found If you find any of these articles at all convincing, let me know and I'll point out the problems with them. Update: while I am definitely interested in continuing to read your arguments, I'm really really keen to know about anyone anywhere on the Internet who seems well-informed on the subject and writes arguing against it. Such people seem to be strikingly few and far between, especially on the specific question of the plausibility of recovery. There's a hypothesis here on why that might be, but I'm not sure it's enough to wholly account for it.

Date: 2010-01-22 04:33 pm (UTC)
barakta: (Default)
From: [personal profile] barakta
Random thought:
I wonder what happens if you die of something where your body/brain deteriorates - e.g cancer cos it wouldn't be legal to kill you off sooner (Switzerland notwithstanding) but would theoretically be much harder to preserve you cos your body (and brain?) may have wasted away a lot so there's additional barriers to being able to freeze you.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 10:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios