The accusation of anti-Semitism
Jan. 8th, 2004 08:43 am(This was originally a comment in
webcowgirl's journal, but I wanted to share.)
The New York Times recently published a column by one David Brooks in which he alleges that
those who oppose the neoconservative agenda are anti-Semitic. (More coverage: Talking Points, This Modern World)
I look forward to the Times carrying my rebuttal in next week's edition, in which I argue that Brooks only says that because he likes to fuck pigs.
The New York Times recently published a column by one David Brooks in which he alleges that
those who oppose the neoconservative agenda are anti-Semitic. (More coverage: Talking Points, This Modern World)
I look forward to the Times carrying my rebuttal in next week's edition, in which I argue that Brooks only says that because he likes to fuck pigs.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 06:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 06:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 06:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 06:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 07:27 am (UTC)(1) You disagree with the President, so you are a slanderous liberal commie mutant traitor (http://www.anncoulter.com/).
(2) Slanderous liberal commie mutant traitors are anti-semites who use the word "neoconservative" to mean "Jew" (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/06/opinion/06BROO.html).
(3) By (1) and (2), you are an anti-semite (etc.).
(4) Since you're Jewish and an anti-semite (etc.), you are self-hating. (QED)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 09:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 09:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 12:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 07:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 02:38 am (UTC)By the same argument, what does he think "neo-Nazi" means?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 03:13 am (UTC)Kinda like all the phrases that English people can use when they want to be derogatory about homosexuals, or French people, or the disabled, which don't actually mean anything of the sort and would puzzle the hell out of anyone not steeped in our culture.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 03:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 06:21 am (UTC)I wonder if anyone bothered to tell Brooks that most American Jews actually vote Democrat and have done for as long as anyone can remember.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 06:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 06:23 am (UTC)(2) The only ones whose religion I'm aware of are fundamentalist Christians. From Texas. Several of them have gotten in the news for being prominent in their pro-Christian religious bigotry.
(3) These are the same people (like, the same actual physical human beings) who would, thirty years ago, talk about how those evil "New York" liberals are scheming to take away all your money, drink the blood of your babies, and kill Jesus. They worked for Nixon, for God's sake.
Neocon is not code for Jewish, 'K?
Ooh further proof
Date: 2004-01-08 10:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 04:58 am (UTC)I'm not sure about the pig-fucking business. I doubt he could manage to satisy one.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 05:19 am (UTC)Possibly, although it would be amusing to watch him try...
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 06:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 06:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 07:04 am (UTC)That makes spectacularly little sense. Surely he must have realised that his logical inference just well, wasn't? When I started reading I thought it was a piss-take due to the almost complete absence of valid logic.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 10:12 am (UTC)Neoconservatives = Christian Right = Mr Bush and bunch of other loonies = people who know all Muslims are terrorists out to destroy The World as We Know It (tm) = people who treat Muslims such as Palestinians as sub-human = Israeli government = Israel's right to exist = all Jews
Therefore anti neo-cons = anti Jews
QED!
Do try to keep up.
And don't forget: these are the End Times, so we have to have war across the world starting in the Middle East, so that the aforementioned Christians can be Raptured and go to heaven, and therefore Israel has to piss off its neighbours enough to cause World War III, so thus Shrub has to prod that into happening so he can be saved. Ergo neocons and Jews have the same interests and are obviously the same thing.
I knew there was a reason I gave up reading US papers.
Do you think I could get every American on LJ to vote for me as President in 6 years time? They and I would all be old enough by then and there'll probably be enough of them for me to win...
Thre's a little too much thinking ahead of the game here.
Date: 2004-01-08 01:35 pm (UTC)On both sides.
People should be judged on what they do, not what they are.
This means that judging all Jews as the same because the are Jewish is bad. That is anti-semitism.
Judging one Jew as bad because he has done something bad is not anti-semitic because is not a judgement of ALL Jews.
This is the level we must talk on if we are to adequately communicate with these morons, assuming that they are amenable to communication in any way.
I am gradually becoming more and more convinced that locking step with them in any kind of debate is a waste of time.