![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ciphergothUpdate: I bought a Kodak DX3900, 3.1 megapixel camera. It's half the weight of my old one.
I promise I bought a copy of "What Digital Camera" a couple of days *before* Alison got given one that's better than mine. But anyway, it's certainly the final push I needed to go and buy one. I can get one that's higher resolution and half the weight of my existing one for about £200.
It has to be CF, zoom lens, at least two megapixels. Weight is very important - it's the size and weight of my existing camera that's finally driving me mad. But it doesn't have to be better than Alison's :-)
I'm currently looking at the Nikon Coolpix 2000 and the Samsung Digimax 230.
Tips?
I promise I bought a copy of "What Digital Camera" a couple of days *before* Alison got given one that's better than mine. But anyway, it's certainly the final push I needed to go and buy one. I can get one that's higher resolution and half the weight of my existing one for about £200.
It has to be CF, zoom lens, at least two megapixels. Weight is very important - it's the size and weight of my existing camera that's finally driving me mad. But it doesn't have to be better than Alison's :-)
I'm currently looking at the Nikon Coolpix 2000 and the Samsung Digimax 230.
Tips?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
May I suggest a website?
Date: 2002-08-13 03:49 am (UTC)Its quite useful for digicam look ups and reviews.
There is also www.megapixel.net
Two sites I always keep in contact with when it comes to digicams...
I've not found any reviews of the Samsung... and as you want CF a Olympus cam is out of the question :-)
But Steve seems to think the Coolpix 2000 is definatly worth a look at :-)
(from http://www.steves-digicams.com/2002_reviews/nikon2000_pg5.html )
Laterz