![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I stopped reading Beware of pushing Catholics out of the progressive club at the point where I reached the phrase "atheist deity, Richard Dawkins".
What makes this sort of talk a total waste of everyone's time is that you can say this about anything. Creationists love to talk about the priesthood of Darwinism, or global warming denialists the acolytes of Al Gore enforcing orthodoxy. By the same standards, Phil Plait counts as some sort of Pope of heliocentrism. It requires absolutely no thought or imagination to speak of a belief you don't like in this way; it shares absolutely no insight into what problems that belief might have. As a form of commentary, or as a form of humour, I therefore have to rank it below sarcasm, below puns, and somewhere just above repeating what the other person said in a high-pitched girly voice.
What makes this sort of talk a total waste of everyone's time is that you can say this about anything. Creationists love to talk about the priesthood of Darwinism, or global warming denialists the acolytes of Al Gore enforcing orthodoxy. By the same standards, Phil Plait counts as some sort of Pope of heliocentrism. It requires absolutely no thought or imagination to speak of a belief you don't like in this way; it shares absolutely no insight into what problems that belief might have. As a form of commentary, or as a form of humour, I therefore have to rank it below sarcasm, below puns, and somewhere just above repeating what the other person said in a high-pitched girly voice.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 06:41 am (UTC)Of course there is a certain amount of "appeal to authority" in understanding science -- I don't have time to go and recreate for myself the latest research in spin glasses or whatever. But other people do. And science changes in unpredictable ways, and ideas that were previously held are abandoned. Everything is contingent, much is unexplained, everything has be justified at some empirical level, and is (ideally) open to scrutiny. No faith necessary.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 07:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-23 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 06:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 06:59 am (UTC)Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 Unrouteable address (state 14).
Is gmail on your mail server's shitlist?
no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 07:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 07:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 07:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 08:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 08:10 am (UTC)I recently had a Catholic who objected to my opinions of the Pope demanding I explain or repudiate something Peter Tatchell said. I had to look up who he was first.