Date: 2010-05-06 08:17 pm (UTC)
I'm not sure how much you should read into these markets. They don't appear to have much market depth, and in any case I'm not sure it's an efficient market. By and large, all anyone participating in these markets has to go on is the polls, with all the empirical fudges that go into producing them, and the uniform national swing model, which is itself an empirical fudge.

No one knows how or if any of this machinery will work in a three-horse race. I think there's a fair chance that this will be one of those elections where all the polsters (including the exit polls) get it absolutely dreadfully wrong, requiring new empirical methodological fudges in future polling (think 1992). Of course, I have no idea in which direction they will be wrong.

-roy
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 06:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios