ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
An open letter to scientific critics of cryonics

If this isn't to your tastes, don't worry, no doubt I'll be obsessing over something else soon enough :-)

Date: 2010-02-15 02:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
A criticism of that document that met my "ideal points" would be far and away the best anti-cryonics article ever written, so I hope you're able to pursue it.

Date: 2010-02-15 03:04 pm (UTC)
reddragdiva: (Default)
From: [personal profile] reddragdiva
After seeing his ludicrous spin on the hippocampus study, I'm inclined to say "wtf" and dismiss him as a pseudoscientist.

Is that document particularly important to cryonics fans? Do they set sufficient store by it that it's actually worth the effort of demolishing?

Date: 2010-02-15 03:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
Yes, I think so. Best is CEO of the Cryonics Institute, and as I keep saying, no-one has ever done anything like this before. Well, not as a standalone article anyway - there's lots of stuff hidden in blog comments but that's much less useful.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 8th, 2026 06:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios