Evaluating future technology
Jan. 26th, 2010 01:36 pmHow do you tell a reasonable guess about what future technology might bring (eg a manned mission to Mars) from unreasonable guesses (eg teleportation)?
I'm inclined to think that you have to get down to the technical nitty-gritty. If you don't know the field, it might be reasonable to think that in the future we'll prove that our ciphers are unbreakable. Actually, for everyday useful ciphers, a proof that they are secure with no unproven assumptions is much harder than you might think if you've not studied CS. There's no reason I'd expect you to know that if you're not a computer scientist, but if your vision of the near future included provably unbreakable ciphers, I'd want to explain why that doesn't look very likely at the moment.
What do you think?
I'm inclined to think that you have to get down to the technical nitty-gritty. If you don't know the field, it might be reasonable to think that in the future we'll prove that our ciphers are unbreakable. Actually, for everyday useful ciphers, a proof that they are secure with no unproven assumptions is much harder than you might think if you've not studied CS. There's no reason I'd expect you to know that if you're not a computer scientist, but if your vision of the near future included provably unbreakable ciphers, I'd want to explain why that doesn't look very likely at the moment.
What do you think?
no subject
Date: 2010-01-26 03:03 pm (UTC)It's only if you want the astronauts to return to Earth, alive, that it gets prohibitively difficult.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-26 03:06 pm (UTC)However, if for some reason we discovered tomorrow that the first nation to get a manned mission to Mars and back would immediately gain some massive military advantage over all the others, I don't suppose anyone thinks it would take all that long.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-26 07:43 pm (UTC)