Cryonics

Jan. 21st, 2010 09:29 am
ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
I'm considering signing up with the Cryonics Institute. Are you signed up? I'd be interested to hear your reasons why or why not. It does of course sound crazy, but when you press past that initial reaction to find out why it's crazy, I haven't heard a really satisfactory argument yet, and I'm interested to hear what people think. There are many reasons it might not work, but are there reasons to think it's really unlikely to work? How likely does recovery need to be for it to be worth it?

Date: 2010-01-21 12:17 pm (UTC)
calum: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calum
I think the simple answer is..

Is it worth it, to you, to spend that sort of money on a longshot.. as opposed to leaving that money to someone you care about, or an organisation you care about.

I do think its a longshot, but its not an impossibility

Date: 2010-01-21 12:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
Why is it that despite these proposed better uses of the money, we are prepared to get a curry delivered from time to time, but not to spend money on the possibility of billions of years more life? Why not draw the cost from the curry fund instead of the "saving the world" fund?

Date: 2010-01-21 12:27 pm (UTC)
calum: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calum
Like I said.. thats your choice. $30,000+ is no small amount, but you can choose whether its worth it for you. I wouldnt do it, but if it makes sense to you, why not.

Doesnt make sense to me, personally - but you think quite differently about some things, so I can see why it would to you.

Date: 2010-01-21 12:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
So if it were much cheaper, like £10-20 a month, you'd be much more tempted to sign up?

Date: 2010-01-21 12:40 pm (UTC)
calum: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calum
Actually, no, personally, I wouldn't. I believe something leaves your body when you die, and I cant imagine that you could bring someone back to life years later. But that's my spiritual perspective, and I dont expect others to agree with it - if I didnt feel that way, £10-20 a month would make a lot more sense than $30,000 on death.

Date: 2010-01-21 12:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
I'm not really competent to debate what the implications of this belief are so I won't push this, but whatever it is that you believe leaves people doesn't leave them when their heart stops, so why do you think it would leave a cryopreserved person?

Date: 2010-01-21 12:53 pm (UTC)
calum: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calum
I guess Im not competant to say that it does leave a cryopreserved person..

I've seen a few people die. I was pretty sure I could tell when that something left them. Other people present felt the same. It wasnt immediately when their heart stopped, etc.. So, maybe (assuming my belief is true here) you could prevent that by preserving them before it went?

I really dont know. Its just another factor in the gamble as to whether this is a good idea for me, personally.. And it leans me towards no.

Date: 2010-01-22 09:12 pm (UTC)
henry_the_cow: (Default)
From: [personal profile] henry_the_cow
Right now I'm not sure I'll have enough money to live comfortably when I retire, so if I put money aside it will be for that eventuality, which seems far more likely than cryo-resurrection. Then, when I die, I want to leave money to my wife and child,if they survive me.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 03:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios