ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
You are, I think, entitled to the right to hold and express any opinion without being shut down by the State for doing so; that is where the entitlement ends.

[Poll #1410915]
(edit: removed Harlan Ellison quote, which doesn't really express what I'm getting at here)

Date: 2009-06-04 03:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hughe.livejournal.com
and what do "others" mean? fellow citezens? the government? MI5?

It's more complicated than it sounds. Sounds like there is some balance between them not harrassing others and others not physically asaulting them :)

Date: 2009-06-04 03:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
and what do "others" mean? fellow citezens? the government? MI5?

Another excellent question you need to answer in order to give the phrase meaning, yes. What duties does it impose, and on whom? Beware of simply chasing the meaninglessness from one phrase to another!

Date: 2009-06-04 03:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hughe.livejournal.com
but I think overall I think people have the right to be wrong. I don't think it puts any duty on anybody else. If they use their wrong and get burned (eg "in my opinion fire is cold") then it was their responsibility to research their opinions before putting them into practice. I don't think it is the goverment's responsibility to tell them fire is hot. Other people may want to, but I dont think it is a duty.

Date: 2009-06-04 03:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
But the point of the second article is that it's meaningless to posit a "right" that imposes no duty on anyone.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 26th, 2025 02:06 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios