ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
Some really interesting answers on what proofs you know. The most common proofs people mention are the ones I name, plus Cantor's diagonalisation argument that |R| > |N| - cool. More specific comments follow.
[livejournal.com profile] wildbadger -- product of two compact spaces is compact
A strong opening! I looked it up and found Tychonoff's Theorem - looks interesting.
[livejournal.com profile] cryptodragon -- A number of them from crypto stuff
Interesting, name us a favourite?
[livejournal.com profile] simple_epiphany -- As a third-year maths student, I'm required to know quite a lot of them, but the one for the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem is quite nice.
Bolzano–Weierstrass theorem on Wikipedia. I think I could remember that proof. Cool, thanks!
[livejournal.com profile] aegidian -- Cantor's Diagonalisation, proving there are as many rational numbers as there are integers.
Ah, the proof that |Q| = |N| rather than the proof that |R| > |N|?
[livejournal.com profile] olethros -- Maybe I lied. I can prove (by recursion) that all marbles in the world are the same colour.
I know that proof :-) Oh go on, there must be a *valid* proof you like!
[livejournal.com profile] keirf -- Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem - every bounded sequence in R{n} has a convergent subsequence
A second showing for this theorem!
[livejournal.com profile] ajva -- that 0.999...=1
Don't you need to get into the construction of the real numbers to explain this one?
[livejournal.com profile] ergotia -- The infinite number of primes/hotel at the end of the universe one
Two proofs for the price of one :-)
[livejournal.com profile] nikolasco -- irrationality of sqrt(2) (fundamental theorem of arithmetic, even/odd, well-ordered)
What proofs are you referring to with "even/odd, well-ordered"?
Thanks all, please keep commenting :-)

Irrationality of sqrt(2)

Date: 2009-02-19 11:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nikolasco.livejournal.com
Hopefully I wrote these without errors:

even/odd:
  1. sqrt(2) = p/q for some integers p and q that are relatively prime (i.e. smallest reduced form)
  2. 2 = p2/q2
  3. p2 = 2q2
  4. note: p is clearly even, so q must be odd (by our premise)
  5. note that the square of an even integer must be of the form 4k for some integer k . So, we can substitute: 4k = 2q2
  6. 2k = q2 , clearly q is even as well (contradiction)

well-ordering:
  1. sqrt(2)*q = p for some integers p and q . w.l.o.g. let q by the smallest such integer
  2. note that 1 < sqrt(2) < 2
  3. so: sqrt(2) - 1 < 1
  4. multiply both sides by q: (sqrt(2) - 1)*q < q
  5. distribute: sqrt(2)*q - q
  6. let: sqrt(2)*q - q = s where s is an integer
  7. s*sqrt(2) is also an integer:
    1. s*sqrt(2) = (sqrt(2)*q - q)*sqrt(2)
    2. distribute: s*sqrt(2) = sqrt(2)*q*sqrt(2) - q*sqrt(2)
    3. simplify: s*sqrt(2) = 2*q - q*sqrt(2)
    4. substitute: s*sqrt(2) = 2*q - p
  8. So s is both smaller than q and s*sqrt(2) is an integer. This violates our assumption that q was the smallest such integer.

Re: Irrationality of sqrt(2)

Date: 2009-02-20 08:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
Ah, I misunderstood what you were saying - I had thought you were listing four different things you knew proofs for, but you were referring to three different proofs of that one thing that so troubled Pythagoras. Thanks! I didn't know that last one, it's neat.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 31st, 2026 01:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios