Praying nurses
Feb. 2nd, 2009 11:20 amNurse suspended without pay for offering to pray for a patient during a home visit - what do you think?
(Snowed in today, trying to work from home but it's not really a workplace atmosphere around here today :-)
Updated: the patient is described as a Christian in the article. One wonders if this means Christian as in really a Christian, or "Christian I suppose" which AFAICT is the majority religion of the UK. Updated: actually "have Christian beliefs myself" is more like the phrasing I'd expect from someone who takes it seriously.
(Snowed in today, trying to work from home but it's not really a workplace atmosphere around here today :-)
Updated: the patient is described as a Christian in the article. One wonders if this means Christian as in really a Christian, or "Christian I suppose" which AFAICT is the majority religion of the UK. Updated: actually "have Christian beliefs myself" is more like the phrasing I'd expect from someone who takes it seriously.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:28 am (UTC)I think that suspension without pay seems incredibly excessive for a first offence. Of course this nurse may have received endless warnings about this sort of thing.
I think I generally don't like it when people complain because *someone else* might be offended - it drives me up the wall that people do this so much at BiCon.
I think I prefer "Would you like me to pray for you?" to "I'll pray for you", but not by much. For some reason, "You'll be in my prayers" winds me up a lot less.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:34 am (UTC)Plus, the prayer studies have shown that patients do worse when they know someone is praying for her.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:34 am (UTC)On one hand, at least she didn't force it on her, and actually asked first (which is more than some would do)... On the other hand, it is a little presumptious that someone would want to be prayed for, or even that they were the same religion as them.
I don't think it's worth her losing her job over, though!
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:37 am (UTC)I find the whole thing quite odd, to be honest. I read it yesterday and went "Eh?"
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:40 am (UTC)The thing with 'I'll pray for you' is there's no polite way to disagree - "I'd really rather you didn't" doesn't go down well.
At least things have improved in the NHS - when I was born my mother was explicitly told that if I wasn't baptised I wouldn't live through the night. For years she wanted to take me back to the hospital and do "ner ner na ner ner" - but then my parents did eventually decide to name me after the guardian angel while hoping for the best...
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:47 am (UTC)The stuff I've seen shows a mild positive effect when they know they're being prayed for - but I can't find any of that either!
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:48 am (UTC)I don't think it's appropriate _in general_. But if they got chatting, and the patient told her she was a Christian then it might have been a reasonable thing to offer.
Without video footage of the event I don't think I could make a decision.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:50 am (UTC)I think that offering to pray for someone isn't of itself offensive, just possibly open to misinterpretation. The thing is, you don't NEED to tell someone you will pray for them, you can just go home and do it, thus not risking anyone being offended. I find it strange that she felt the need to ask when she could just go and add them to her prayer list.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:53 am (UTC)It probably warrants another disciplinary hearing and a written warning, but suspension without pay still seems over the top when the second offense is far less egregious than the first. OTOH as I say we may not know the whole story - if there's a string of occasions then eventually you do get to this stage.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:55 am (UTC)Compulsory religion in schools concerns me far more, as the audience is equally captive.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:57 am (UTC)There are certain situations where the best guide to whether you were in the right is whether you were right. This is one of them: if the patient saw fit to complain, then you fucked up in a morally culpable way.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 11:58 am (UTC)I think that suspension without pay still seems excessive. But can't she just pray to get her job back?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 12:00 pm (UTC)It would certainly seem like an over-reaction if the nurse's account is accurate and there's no previous. If she was more upfront about it than she's making out, and this was far from the first complaint, and she'd been warned about this formally ... then it would seem entirely appropriate.
We don't know any of that.
(Some reports say that she does have previous, but from years and years ago. Again, if she's not put a foot wrong between then and now: over-reaction. If she'd been causing trouble on this matter continually since then: entirely appropriate.)
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 12:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 12:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 12:04 pm (UTC)Deciding later on that a different patient might some day be offended is something I'm not convinced by.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 12:05 pm (UTC)The facts as presented could cover everything from the nurse, as part of a conversation in which the patient said she was a Christian, asking whether in that case she'd like the nurse to pray for her, to the nurse forcefully and aggressively asking to be allowed to pray for her despite the patient obviously not wanting her to. In the former case I don't think any disciplinary action should be taken; suspension without pay seems harsh for the latter, but as a repeat offence I suppose it might be warranted.
And, of course, we've no idea whether the nurse is at all liked at her work. If she's known as 'that annoying religious nutter who creeps us all out', any excuse to get rid of her might seem reasonable to her employers.
I suspect the truth is somewhat in between. It seems odd to me to discipline a nurse for something of this nature that the patient themselves didn't complain about (I can see that it would be appropriate in some circumstances, but here the degree of actual offence - or lack of it - does seem significant).
no subject
Date: 2009-02-02 12:07 pm (UTC)