Cognitive bias
Jan. 8th, 2009 01:41 pmRoughly, "cognitive bias" is the empirical study of systematic, irrational biases that we all show to some extent or other in the way we think about the world. These biases can be demonstrated in controlled experimental settings, where we can largely rule out rational explanations for the behaviours seen.
One example is anchoring: asked whether they thought an unknown quantity was more or less than a number produced in front of them using a roulette wheel, subsequent guesses at what the number was were irrationally close to the number the roulette wheel produced. Their guesses had been "anchored" on the number they'd previously been given, even though they knew it was a random number.
I'm curious to know whether this is something people think about much, hence this (fairly imperfect) poll. Where I say "people" below, I mean people demographically roughly like you.
For those not familiar with the convention "snowflake" means "none of these answers fit what I'd like to say, so I'll comment below and explain".
thehalibutkid, we await your comment :-)
[Poll #1327489]
I'm thinking about this because I've just finished reading "Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me)", and I'm about to start on "Predictably Irrational", both of which are pop science books in this field. See also Wikipedia's list of cognitive biases.
Please do comment with any thoughts the poll doesn't cover, of course!
One example is anchoring: asked whether they thought an unknown quantity was more or less than a number produced in front of them using a roulette wheel, subsequent guesses at what the number was were irrationally close to the number the roulette wheel produced. Their guesses had been "anchored" on the number they'd previously been given, even though they knew it was a random number.
I'm curious to know whether this is something people think about much, hence this (fairly imperfect) poll. Where I say "people" below, I mean people demographically roughly like you.
For those not familiar with the convention "snowflake" means "none of these answers fit what I'd like to say, so I'll comment below and explain".
[Poll #1327489]
I'm thinking about this because I've just finished reading "Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me)", and I'm about to start on "Predictably Irrational", both of which are pop science books in this field. See also Wikipedia's list of cognitive biases.
Please do comment with any thoughts the poll doesn't cover, of course!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 01:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 02:01 pm (UTC)So, in a sense, I've never heard of it, while still having a lot of layperson's knowledge about it.
On the last two, I ticked 'always', but only because you didn't have a 'usually' option, and 'sometimes' seemed to understate how often I use it.
(Edited for typo)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 02:41 pm (UTC)This sort of thing should be taught in school.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 02:43 pm (UTC)Soph x
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 02:47 pm (UTC)I'm also feeling increasingly shaky and interested in how people can not accurately know their own motivations and why they made past decisions.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 02:51 pm (UTC)This comment unselfconsciously girly, no content
From:(no subject)
From:Re: This comment unselfconsciously girly, no content
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 07:05 pm (UTC)As far as my own decisions go how much thought i give to basis depends largely on my spoon levels and how much mental time and space i have spare. Which prolly means i'm least likely to consider biases at times when i'm most vunerable to them ...
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 10:38 pm (UTC)And before your brain heads to the most used acronym for your particular interests, no, NOT that CBT, nor does it have anything to do with motorbikes, its cognitive behavioural therapy.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-09 12:34 am (UTC)I snowflaked on a couple of questions because the term "cognitive bias" as described in the Wikipedia article seems to cover a wide range of different phenomena. Some of these I consider - e.g. probabilities, cause-and-effect, wanting to look good, hindsight - although I haven't grouped them together or thought of them as "cognitive bias" per se. Others I don't - e.g. anchoring.
I think I'm poor at looking for such mistakes in my own reasoning and more likely to spot them in other people's thinking. I'm generally better at thinking about things than about people (including myself).
no subject
Date: 2009-01-09 03:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-09 11:30 pm (UTC)