ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
David Sedaris on undecided voters:
I look at these people and can’t quite believe that they exist. Are they professional actors? I wonder. Or are they simply laymen who want a lot of attention?

To put them in perspective, I think of being on an airplane. The flight attendant comes down the aisle with her food cart and, eventually, parks it beside my seat. “Can I interest you in the chicken?” she asks. “Or would you prefer the platter of shit with bits of broken glass in it?”

To be undecided in this election is to pause for a moment and then ask how the chicken is cooked.
(nb the rest of the article isn't as funny)

Date: 2008-10-22 10:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] friend-of-tofu.livejournal.com
<3 !!!

I do love that man. Excellent link, sir. Well done.

Date: 2008-10-22 10:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
I've been reading Kos...

Date: 2008-10-23 06:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] webcowgirl.livejournal.com
I really enjoy David Sedaris.

I wonder if McCain's strategy is to hope the Republicans have cooked the voter rolls well enough to make the difference?

Date: 2008-10-23 07:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ravenrigan.livejournal.com
ROTFL.

Someone posted this on a (totally unrelated) community I am in.

"PBS has an online poll posted asking if Sarah Palin is qualified. Apparently the right wing knew about this in advance and are flooding the voting with YES votes.

The poll will be reported on PBS and picked up by mainstream media. It can influence undecided voters in swing states.

Please do two things -- takes 20 seconds.

1) Click on link and vote yourself.

Here's the link:
http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html

2) Then send this to every single Osama-Biden voter you know, and urge them to vote and pass it on.

The last thing us need is PBS saying they're viewers think Sa rah Palin is qualified."

Have fun! I'm just hoping they don't pull a stunt like the last time and shoehorn the vested interests candidate in whatever America thinks.

Date: 2008-10-23 08:20 am (UTC)
lovingboth: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lovingboth
Not this one again.

What makes it worse is counting the errors in the last sentence of the quote and wondering who is qualified :)

Date: 2008-10-23 08:17 am (UTC)
lovingboth: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lovingboth
In reality, most people who say they're 'undecided' are either too polite to tell you they're voting for the nasty party/person (so it was the Tories in the 1990s here) or aren't going to vote. One would hope that they're being asked how they voted last time, for example.

And some of this stuff strays into 'you'd be stupid to vote for McCain' territory...

Date: 2008-10-23 10:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
But it is stupid of them to vote for McCain in the vast majority of cases. Obviously our candidates can't say this out loud, but there's no reason we shouldn't.

I'm not saying they're stupid people, but it's a stupid vote.

Date: 2008-10-23 11:08 am (UTC)
lovingboth: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lovingboth
Depends on your priorities.

Look at how many gay men voted for Thatcher, even after s28, because they saw money as more important ('after all homophobia only happens to poor people'). Similarly with how many gay men worked for Reagan's re-election campaign, even as they were dying of Aids and he did less than nothing about the epidemic.

You think it's a stupid vote, I think it's a stupid vote, but it is saying they're stupid. Not everyone who voted for GWB is stupid, for example.

It strikes me that a good person to talk to about this would be Matthew Parris.

Date: 2008-10-23 09:48 am (UTC)

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 02:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios