ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
Intrade have had a market open for a few days on whether the bailout would go ahead by 30 Sep, and it's gone no higher than a 25% chance in the last 24 hours.

On the same page you'll find another market for whether we'll get one by 31 October, and that's still at 76%.

So at least some people who knew that this vote wasn't going to pass think there's going to be a bailout but not yet.

Also, scary fact from [livejournal.com profile] spyinthehaus: the cost of the bailout is roughly four times the value of all the gold in Fort Knox.

Date: 2008-09-29 09:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_nicolai_/
...but less than the cost of the war in Iraq so far...

Date: 2008-09-29 10:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
This page estimates the war in Iraq at around $558Bn so far and they seem like they're not going to be biased towards low estimates...
Edited Date: 2008-09-29 10:32 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-09-30 02:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zwol.livejournal.com
I know I've seen a figure in the range of US$20-25 trillion associated with the war. Possibly that's including all the indirect costs they can think of.

Date: 2008-10-01 08:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_nicolai_/
Including 2009 spending, FAS reckon the Iraq war is $653Bn, so I agree they haven't quite hit $700Bn there. Including war in Afghanistan they reckon $858Bn to 2009.
My statement will be correct in a year or so. How encouraging.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 31st, 2025 02:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios