ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
Thanks for some interesting and surprising responses to the JFK question. At the risk of creating more heat than light, let me try another example, one that I think might be a little less comfortable to be neutral about.

It seems that many people believe that on the morning of September 11, 2001, four thousand or more Israelis who were working at the World Trade Center did not show up for work.

Are those people wrong?

(Update: amended as per [livejournal.com profile] ajva's caveat)

Date: 2008-05-19 04:38 pm (UTC)
djm4: (Default)
From: [personal profile] djm4
Fair enough. (It wasn't a snark, by the way, and I hope it didn't come across as one - I was genuinely trying to be helpful.)

I feel if I could get that well established I'd be able to make a start on the second.

I think you're mistaken. I suspect (from knowing some of the things you'd like to feel justified in telling people they're wrong about) that you'll be able to show (1) for a high degree of certainly about some things, but that they often won't in general be the things you'd like (2) to apply to. That's certainly my experience - sometimes, I just have to accept that I'm telling people they're wrong without the safety net of absolute certainty, or else I have to agree to differ.

None of which should be taken to mean that I think it's a bad thing to try to establish the truth as best I can in most situations, especially if I'm about to tell someone that they're wrong (whether it's 'definitely' wrong or 'overheard conversation' wrong).

Date: 2008-05-19 04:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
Oops, yes, I had thought it was a mild snark, sorry and sorry to be snarky in response.

You might be right, but the discussion of which things it's OK to contradict can't start until I've established that there's at least one occasion on which it's OK.

Date: 2008-05-19 04:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wildeabandon.livejournal.com
Although my first comment was slightly tongue in cheek, I'm still not quite sure why "some people are sometimes wrong" is a pre-requisite for "it's okay to tell them so". Apart from anything else, it assumes that it's only okay to tell people that they're wrong if you're right that they're wrong, and actually, I think when two people disagree it's okay for both of them to tell the other that they're wrong, because we (and they) don't know which of them is wrong until a consensus is reached (and possibly not even then, but at that point we have stronger evidence for which view is correct)

Date: 2008-05-19 05:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
The prerequisite is just that it's *possible* to be wrong. If it's impossible to be wrong then obviously telling someone they're wrong puts you on a hiding to nothing. I agree with the rest of what you say.

Date: 2008-05-19 06:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keirf.livejournal.com
I annoy my wife and have annoyed partners in the past by not taking a strong stand on any beliefs. I think spending four years working on a Ph.D. concerning truth and provability in mathematics has something to do with it.

Of course it's socially possible to be wrong. You may believe that philosophically it's not possible to be wrong (or right) but that's not something you have to live your life by every minute of the day.

Unless you're Wittgenstein.

Date: 2008-05-19 07:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
How do you feel about the example in this post?

Date: 2008-05-20 07:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keirf.livejournal.com
Not as emotional as I felt when I was standing inside the Anne Frank house in Amsterdam. But I wouldn't think it was worth having any kind of discussion with someone who genuinely believed that kind of rumour. In fact I'd probably tell them not to be such a fucking idiot and that would be the end of the conversation.

I started to type something about truth/falsity and the problems of trying to apply such terms to social concepts, but a Livejournal comment box isn't really a suitable forum for that.

Date: 2008-05-19 07:59 pm (UTC)
djm4: (Default)
From: [personal profile] djm4
Whether or not I think it's OK to contradict someone has very little to do with whether or not I can prove that they're wrong (I accept, based on what you write here, that it's different for you).

I will tell someone they're wrong for non-consensually harming someone else. (I will also tell them that they're wrong if they try to stop consensual harm, as it happens.) I can't prove that it's wrong, but I feel that it is with sufficient force that I will act on that feeling.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 31st, 2025 04:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios