ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
Clarification: By "smart" I mean general smarts: the sort of smarts that allow you to do things like pass a Turing test or solve open problems in nanotechnology. Obviously computers are ahead of humans in narrow domains like playing chess.

NB: your guess as to what will happen should also be one of your guesses about what might happen - thanks! This applies to [livejournal.com profile] wriggler, [livejournal.com profile] ablueskyboy, [livejournal.com profile] thekumquat, [livejournal.com profile] redcountess, [livejournal.com profile] thehalibutkid, [livejournal.com profile] henry_the_cow and [livejournal.com profile] cillygirl. If you tick only one option (which is not the last) in the first poll, it means you think it's the only possible outcome.

[Poll #1103617]

And of course, I'm fascinated to know why you make those guesses. In particular - I'm surprised how many people think it's likely that machines as smart as humans might emerge while nothing smarter comes of it, and I'd love to hear more about that position.

Date: 2007-12-10 04:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meta.ath0.com (from livejournal.com)
I think with sufficient will, man could develop machines as smart as humans in the next 40 years. However, I don't think enough people are going to care to supply the money. It would have to be a space-race-like effort, and frankly, Mexicans and Indians are a lot cheaper, more flexible and manueverable, and easier to replace.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 12:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios