Artificial Intelligence and the year 2047

[ciphergoth]

Clarification: By "smart" I mean general smarts: the sort of smarts that allow you to do things like pass a Turing test or solve open problems in nanotechnology. Obviously computers are ahead of humans in narrow domains like playing chess.

NB: your guess as to what will happen should also be one of your guesses about what might happen - thanks! This applies to wriggler, ablueskyboy, thekumquat, redcountess, thehalibutkid, henry_the_cow and cillygirl. If you tick only one option (which is not the last) in the first poll, it means you think it's the only possible outcome.

[Poll #1103617]

And of course, I'm fascinated to know why you make those guesses. In particular - I'm surprised how many people think it's likely that machines as smart as humans might emerge while nothing smarter comes of it, and I'd love to hear more about that position.

Comments

[drdoug.livejournal.com]

Interesting verb, "expect" - to me it conjures up expectation values and hence one's best guess, which for UK people in their mid-to-late-30s (guessing at the composition of ciphergoth's FL) is definitely north of 40 years for men and 45 years for women IIRC.

"Count on", though, is another thing, as you pointed out earlier on in this thread. I'm not counting on living more than another 40 years, but I expect to.

I'm not counting on dying before then either, or I wouldn't be shovelling all this cash in to a pension for one thing. I'm trying to ensure that my plans cope well with all options between reaching well beyond the ton-up and dropping down dead of a massive brain haemorrhage before I finish posting this comment.

(Which latter would be rather tragic for my nearest and dearest but would at least mean people at my funeral could all say things like "Well he didn't want to go but he'd have really appreciated the manner.")