ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
Clarification: By "smart" I mean general smarts: the sort of smarts that allow you to do things like pass a Turing test or solve open problems in nanotechnology. Obviously computers are ahead of humans in narrow domains like playing chess.

NB: your guess as to what will happen should also be one of your guesses about what might happen - thanks! This applies to [livejournal.com profile] wriggler, [livejournal.com profile] ablueskyboy, [livejournal.com profile] thekumquat, [livejournal.com profile] redcountess, [livejournal.com profile] thehalibutkid, [livejournal.com profile] henry_the_cow and [livejournal.com profile] cillygirl. If you tick only one option (which is not the last) in the first poll, it means you think it's the only possible outcome.

[Poll #1103617]

And of course, I'm fascinated to know why you make those guesses. In particular - I'm surprised how many people think it's likely that machines as smart as humans might emerge while nothing smarter comes of it, and I'd love to hear more about that position.

Date: 2007-12-10 12:03 pm (UTC)
aegidian: (cogs)
From: [personal profile] aegidian
Mu - incomplete definition of 'smarter'.

It's a given that some machines are already vastly better at performing some tasks previously performed by human 'computers' already, and this has transformed the human experience of much of the world.

If by "machines vastly smarter than humans" you mean machines capable of exhibiting characteristics indistinguishable from that of a human intellect and yet surpassing any "smart" human intellect, then I doubt it will happen without several considerable shifts in what is currently considered AI. These shifts may occur, but I suspect they may be as elusive as sustainable fusion power.

Date: 2007-12-10 12:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
Have updated post to indicate the kind of "smarter" I mean.

Date: 2007-12-10 12:27 pm (UTC)
djm4: (Default)
From: [personal profile] djm4
I think my answer's still the same, although I expect that the most profound changes won't come from machines being 'our' sort of smarter, even though I believe they will be.

Date: 2007-12-10 11:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] topbit.livejournal.com
The thing with most AI, is when they've invented something that works, it's not called AI anymore.

40 years ago the idea of talking to your computer was fantasy, now people just call it phone hell as they try to tell the gas board how much fuel they've used. Or they will just call it voice recognition, and finish writing the book they'd started before breaking their arm.

If you wanted to find out what was a good book to buy, you asked a friend - now you can login to Amazon as well, and they will list a dozen you might think about, based on what you've read, or browsed before. It's not AI - it's just a suggestion.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 04:28 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios