ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
Rarely have I hung on every word of an essay like I did with these two. A former prominent New Age speaker and author, Karla McLaren became a skeptic in 2004, and she has some very harsh words for the culture and communication of skeptics:

Bridging the Chasm between Two Cultures, the article she wrote for Skeptical Enquirer in 2004.
I have a selfish reason for asking these questions, because one of my first ideas was to make my own Web site a culturally sensitive portal to the skeptical sites - yet I cannot find a way to do so. I've got a Web page mock-up brewing in my files - a page that I've rewritten maybe fifty times or more-that tries to introduce the concept of skepticism in an open and nonthreatening way. I'd like to include links to the brilliant urban legends site (snopes.com), to Bob Carroll's online Skeptic's Dictionary (skepdic.com), to CSICOP and the Skeptical Inquirer (csicop.org), and to The Skeptic (skeptic.com). I also really wanted to include Quackwatch (quackwatch.org) and James Randi's site (randi.org) - but I just can't find the words. Sure, I can use my site to prepare people for the journey, but I know from experience that they would be in for quite a shock once they clicked on the links. I mean, it's one thing to find out that much of my culture and belief system was based on gossamer and hearsay, but it's another thing altogether to see people like myself being denigrated and pitied.
Her 2007 update

I wish she had a blog!

Date: 2007-11-12 10:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com
Now I like P&T, but Bullshit's more of a mocking show than a debunking show, and when it gets into that Cato Institute crap it shows; there isn't any serious attempt to prove the point, and that does help when their point is unprovable.

Date: 2007-11-12 10:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purplerabbits.livejournal.com
Oh I agree - and I find it noteworthy that few skeptics will point this out when the mocking is in their favour. (And the show does claim to have evidence, of course.)

Date: 2007-11-13 04:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com
I don't know. I rather went off Bullshit when more than a few of the season 2 episodes were mocking tragically deluded individuals rather than cynical moneyspinners, but I certainly remember saying "well, yes, but such-and-such doesn't actually follow..." once or twice.

I think it would be a mistake to hold Bullshit up as a shining example of skeptical rhetoric. If I don't make that mistake I don't really feel obliged to point out every time the rhetoric is weak. :-)

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 10:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios