Lots of storage
Aug. 4th, 2007 05:37 pmIf I buy one of these:
and five of these: 
and stick it all together using Linux software RAID, will that work as a relatively cheap (£370) 2TB RAID-5 storage array?
Will it be very noisy, and if so, should I be looking at getting one of these too so I can stick it in another room?

As you might imagine, I'm giving the whole question of backups a lot of thought at the moment...
and five of these: 
and stick it all together using Linux software RAID, will that work as a relatively cheap (£370) 2TB RAID-5 storage array?
Will it be very noisy, and if so, should I be looking at getting one of these too so I can stick it in another room?
As you might imagine, I'm giving the whole question of backups a lot of thought at the moment...
no subject
Date: 2007-08-04 05:05 pm (UTC)(md0 = RAID0 on disks 1+2, md1 = RAID0 on disks 3+4, disk 5 as a hot spare.)
In terms of noise I'd assume noisy, just because more than one disk in the same place always seems to be noisy - but I guess it depends what they're plugged into. I've got a couple of desktop machines here and the noise they produce easily masks/exceeds the noise from the external USB drives attached to them.
Having an NSLU2 would be a neat thing to have - but I've not yet used one. I think probably the idea of backups is good but you might want to think about where you're going to place the drives. If they're sat upon the top of a PC in an obvious location then there's nothing stopping them from getting lifted along with the main box ...
no subject
Date: 2007-08-04 05:06 pm (UTC)D'oh.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-04 05:11 pm (UTC)Yes, the danger the drive array will be stolen is one thing that makes me think it might be worth placing it elsewhere. However, another option might simply be to bolt it firmly to a sizeable piece of furniture..
no subject
Date: 2007-08-04 05:16 pm (UTC)If you keep an eye upon the status, via mdadm, then RAID-5 should be just fine. I'm always a little paranoid when it comes to my data!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 03:39 pm (UTC)OTOH, I've seen resync trigger drive failures when a drive is marginal.
In your place I'd configure md0 [sda sdb sdc sdd] spare:sde. Which will give you 3xHd disk size.
Since SATA hotswap support seems limited on most of the SATA controllers I've seen . I've tried hotswapping SATA devices before now , and the experience was overall less than satisfactory. It sort of worked but a rebooted tended to be needed anyway.
I suspect this has better reliability than a dual raid1 setup. But I'm too hot to check my gut feeling with hard reasoning.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 09:18 am (UTC)I'd certainly recommend either RAID5 + hotspare or mirror-RAID over stripe-RAID, because even if it is only backup, sod's law says...
no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-04 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-04 05:20 pm (UTC)For example vibration, heat, flood damage(!), etc, are both going to be shared across neighbour drives - even if those at the "far side" of the enclosure are OK.
To compensate for that I'd arranage the drives (physically) in a pattern like this:
[md0-1][md1-1][spare][md0-2][md0-3]
(The idea is that adjacent pairs of disks come from different RAID sets - and with this arrangement any two contiguous drives can die without a problem.)
For RAID-5 if you have two drives die at the same time you're toast, regardless of location.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-04 05:46 pm (UTC)At home, I've always tried to have enough slots to have completely empty ones between drives.