Abilene paradox
Apr. 24th, 2007 04:09 pmJust randomly found this on Wikipedia: Abilene paradox - the possibility that a group decision will be made for X even though every single person in the group would prefer Y. This is a familiar situation to me, and I'm sure that's usual. It can be hard to express a preference weakly - you say "I'd slightly prefer not to get starters", and no matter how many caveats I put on that, it's rare that anyone is prepared to say "well, I really like their spring rolls so I would like to get starters if everyone else is OK".
On the other hand, it's kind of a good problem to have - I'd rather these problems than have everyone fighting to put their own needs ahead of everyone else's...
On the other hand, it's kind of a good problem to have - I'd rather these problems than have everyone fighting to put their own needs ahead of everyone else's...
no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 03:31 pm (UTC)I do wonder sometimes how much of the group communication is non verbal in such situations. Leading our decisions before we voice them.
Firelord
no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 03:37 pm (UTC)Mathematically speaking, Microeconomics use an interesting mix of set theory, orders with games theory thrown in the mix to try to represent "preferences" and associated properties. It's cute.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 03:42 pm (UTC)I'd rather these problems than have everyone fighting to put their own needs ahead of everyone else's...
Yes, indeed. It probably shows that said group is conscientious and caring. Or something.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 04:01 pm (UTC)Although yr specific example doesn't work on me as I'm *always* all about the tasty food when eating out so am most likely to say 'if no-ones minds, I'll get a starter/extra meal/six dinners etc to go along with what everyone else orders' and dive into the menu.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 04:24 pm (UTC)Been looking up Internet2 by any chance? *grin*
no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 04:26 pm (UTC)Did you follow the link to the article on Pluralistic ignorance and in particular the case of Kitty Genovese? A very chilling situation and one that is probably on the increase.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-25 08:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-25 09:07 am (UTC)I don't think I'd say I want to do something if I don't. I might downplay how much I don't want to a little bit, ie "I'd be happy just to stay in, but if you want to go thats fine too."
no subject
Date: 2007-04-25 09:13 am (UTC)"The meek shall inherit the Earth" - oh go on, if you insist...
no subject
Date: 2007-04-25 12:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-04-26 08:04 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-25 12:28 pm (UTC)Does the same happen on mixed or male only committees?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: