Wikipedia

Sep. 19th, 2006 01:27 pm
ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
What do you think of Wikipedia?

If you were in charge of a project to create something like Wikipedia, but better, what would you create?

Date: 2006-09-19 07:24 pm (UTC)
barakta: (Default)
From: [personal profile] barakta
I actually like wikipedia a great deal, mainly as a readable (most of the time) thing for randomness - where one just follows links between pages and can hop from subject to subject...

I wouldn't use it as an authoritative source for anything, but as a first-line of information it is useful to get a handle on something quickly. Some wikipedia pages have useful links on them, which are pointing at authoritative and more in-depth sources of information.

I definitely agree it would be nice if there was a system of marking contentious information contained in wikipedia articles, and perhaps a scale of contentiousness vs acceptedness. So the reader could see that the article was in flux (see discussion/talk pages) or something which doesn't really have contentiousness...

I find wikipedia useful to point complete newbies to a subject at, so I have pointed random bloggers at geeky computer things (such as traceroute and what it does and why, which was written from a point of not much knowledge) and for my mum who is a primary school teacher who does 'projects' or has to swot up and provide teaching materials on a completely new subject with very little time to do research.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 4th, 2026 09:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios