ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth


According to the latest news it looks like Pluto may be denied planet status after all. Rah!

One of these things is not like the others:

Date: 2006-08-23 04:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drdoug.livejournal.com
Hmm - I'd like to leave Pluto out, but the proposal for having 'is the dominant body in its orbit' as a rule is crap - the only merit is that it excludes Pluto. What if an Earth-style body was found intersecting the orbit of a Jupiter-style one? I'd say the smaller body was still a planet. (I know current theory says that's unlikely - but unlikely, not impossible.)

Date: 2006-08-23 05:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
I agree. Since they're explicitly saying that this definition only applies to this Solar System, I don't know why they don't simply define planet as "any body above 200 Yg". Or indeed "any body given that title by the IAU, starting with these eight".

Date: 2006-08-24 12:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keirf.livejournal.com
Nine. Starting with these nine.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 11th, 2026 09:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios