ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
I thought word of this had already spread far and wide, but it seems not to have reached everyone, so here it is. Bizarrely, a bill nicknamed the "Abolition of Parliament Bill" that (indirectly) gives ministers the power to abolish Parliament and seize dictatorial powers in perpituity has not received much press attention.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legislative_and_Regulatory_Reform_Bill

This is being rushed through Parliament with one hour for debate. I kid you not.

http://saveparliament.org.uk/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_Act

Date: 2006-03-28 11:31 am (UTC)
zotz: (Default)
From: [personal profile] zotz
It's exactly the same process - and, coincidentally, exactly the same precedent overturned - as happened when intramarital rape became criminal.

Date: 2006-03-29 07:29 am (UTC)
lovingboth: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lovingboth
Hmmm, Clarence was certainly referenced in that, but a) he wasn't charged with rape, and b) the theory that it wasn't criminal predates it by ooh ages (you can tell I'm away from my notes on this, can't you?)

The Law Commission were using Clarence approvingly in terms of the nature of consent as recently as 2000, eight years after RvR, and six years after the Act that confirmed that marital rape was rape.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 26th, 2026 07:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios