I should add that despite all Diebold's efforts to prevent investigation of their security measures, flaws are often found. Googling for "Diebold security" finds gems like this:
Also, it's generally agreed among security experts that there is *no* purely electronic way of having an election that matches the security and verifiability of a paper-based election.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 06:27 am (UTC)http://gort.ucsd.edu/mtdocs/archives/laz/001866.html
http://www.google.com/search?q=diebold+security
Also, it's generally agreed among security experts that there is *no* purely electronic way of having an election that matches the security and verifiability of a paper-based election.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 07:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 07:29 am (UTC)