Date: 2004-11-05 06:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wechsler.livejournal.com
Then you'd expect it to 5% wrong everywhere, or effectively random noise. This is why correlations are being noted, not raw percentages.

Date: 2004-11-05 06:48 am (UTC)
lovingboth: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lovingboth
No, it will vary. There's no shame in voting TEO in Redneck County, Nevada: it's what all your neighbours are doing. But in somewhere more split, people will fib to pollsters.

I'm not disputing Diebold may be evil enough to do it, but they'd also have to be spectacularly stupid to just say 'add 5% to the evil vote everywhere we think we can get away with it...'

Date: 2004-11-05 06:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
It will vary, of course, but [livejournal.com profile] wechsler specifically mentioned correlations.

And I think we will find

1) that the evidence suggests that Diebold has done exactly that, and

2) that they will not have been spectacularly stupid, but that they correctly predict that any effort to interest the voting public in what will seem like "another hanging chad incident" will fail, and thus that they will totally get away with the fraud they've perpetrated.

The bad guys are often more blatant than you'd ever imagine in your worst nightmares, and they get away with it all the time. Shit, if Bush can get away with blatantly lying to start a war, what can't they get away with?

Date: 2004-11-05 07:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wechsler.livejournal.com
Being incredibly blatant is one of their core tactics. When accused of something, their response is generally along the lines of "No-one in their right mind would do anything that stupid/blatant/unethical."

And it works, because people believe that.

Date: 2004-11-05 08:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jhg.livejournal.com
"All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility;"

-Hitler, Mein Kampf

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie

Date: 2004-11-05 08:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wechsler.livejournal.com
Illustrious company Bush keeps. Thanks for that link.

Date: 2004-11-05 08:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vvalkyri.livejournal.com
At this point I figure it's more important to work to the future rathe r than to figure on fighting it. Strange what a couple days does.

I posted a link to this post, though.

It wouldn't be so much 'add 5% wherever we can find it ' as 'tally the votes normally until vote #x, and then flip one to Bush every Y votes.

Dunno. It's all very disheartening, and the fact that it was this close indicates some major change needed in the Dem message anyway.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 06:51 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios