Date: 2004-01-21 06:13 am (UTC)
babysimon: (abstract)
From: [personal profile] babysimon
In the short term my guess in that the horizontal take off and landing form of space travel might be the best bet to reduce the cost of space travel.

Why? The shuttle didn't exactly carry out its promise to make space flight cheap. Yeah, I know it was a horrible mess compared to what it should have been, but the fact is reusable spaceplanes are expensive and disposable rockets aren't (anywhere near as much). The fact that cost-per-launch is higher on the shuttle than Arianne is pretty damning IMHO.

Date: 2004-01-21 08:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] conflux.livejournal.com
The problem with the shuttle is that it is just an expensive rocket with a re-usable payload. The solid fuel side rockets are not reusable, the main fuel tank needs to be recovered and the whole thing needs a lot of servicing before it can fly again. Oh, and Arianne is only cheaper because the total payload is so much smaller. The shuttle is primarily about getting men into space with satellite launch coming second. A horizontal take off space craft could potentially use the same amount of fuel as a similar sized aircraft to get close to the edge of space and only then switch to rocket propulsion, for example. This would mean a lot less fuel would be needed for a launch and single use rockets could be avoided. The most expensive part of this solution would be designing hybrid jet/rocket engines that do not need to use liquid oxygen until they are at the edge of space.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 09:07 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios