Providing Net services for the new flat
May. 28th, 2003 09:08 pmGeek-only content follows.
We currently have cable Internet, with a Linux box providing
firewalling and NAT to get the rest of the flat online. Email, web
pages, domain hosting etc are done through a colocated box
(antipope.org) on which I've configured bind, exim and apache
appropriately. It's not this way purely out of geek snobbery - this
is actually the only way of providing these things that I actually
understand.
However, now we're going our separate ways this probably isn't the
most sensible way to do things. When
purplerabbits and
sibelian move to their new flat, I'd like to set stuff up so
they're independent of whatever solutions I have set upon
antipope.org.
If I am thinking of it all correctly, they need:
- A broadband connection (no cable where they're going so this has to be ADSL)
- Some way of spreading the Internet goodness to all the computers in the flat (eg a NAT box)
- At least three POP or IMAP accessible email boxes, one for each flatmate
- Name server records for at least three domains
- Static web pages for each domain
- A way of sending outgoing email with a From: field from any domain they own
- Arbitrary forwarding of many email addresses in those domains, to their own POP/IMAP boxes or to other addresses (eg to me).
What haven't I thought of?
This is all a bit of a step into the unknown for me, and none of the people in the new flat are serious techies, so straightforward, well understood solutions are very much to be preferred over interesting, innovative, or technically neat ones.
Update: I really appreciate the responses I'm getting here, they're very helpful, please keep them coming!
no subject
Date: 2003-05-28 02:10 pm (UTC)As for a NAT box, maybe some custom linux builds like smoothwall or ipcop (I think they are both essentially the same thing) are worth looking into, they provide a customised kernel and are easy to use even for a non 'geek' type. They allow you to configure all the usual thingss.
I can't think of much else, but then if I am honest my SO does all that and is very fascistic about anyone else jibbling her setup; I am sane and leave well alone.
As for prices, all three of those ISPs are pretty similar and have pretty good speeds and uptime. The only thing I would recommend strong is NOT to go with BTOpenworld, they are terrible going offline ALL the time and more often being so utterly crap that the connection just lags to hell therby requiring restarting to get any kind of bandwidth out of them.
Other than that, hope some other helpful person fills in my gaps.
Natalya
no subject
Date: 2003-05-29 12:53 am (UTC)Also, some of our machines in work are on BTOpenworld broadband, and it's a disaster area. Plus.net is much stabler.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-29 03:49 am (UTC)I've been hosting low-bandwidth-web/DNS/email/etc services on a Nildram ADSL connection for a couple of years now, and found that the uptime is perfectly adequate for an SMTP server - any NAT router worth it's salt will be capable of forwarding the relevant ports to a server on the internal subnet. If at all possible, avoid hosting the primary and secondary DNS servers for a domain on the same ADSL line, for obvious reasons.