On anonymous comments

[ciphergoth]

(Unrelated note: LJ is under a denial-of-service attack last I heard. Things may be slower than usual. I hope more net vandals start turning up mysteriously dead in unpleasant ways.)

Inspired by events in faerierhona's journal.

Question: when people get abusive comments in their journal, how come they don't just delete them?

So far I haven't had abusive comments here, but I've seen it happen in other journals. I can see some reasons why those people don't want to delete those comments - I'm guessing that part of it is a "standing up to it" thing - but that I can stand up to it isn't in doubt, it's whether it will benefit me or anyone I care about to do so instead of silently deleting it.

If I think someone's just trolling my journal or trying to get a rise - anonymously or otherwise - I'll not bother to reply, I'll just delete the comments. I'm only interested in justifying myself to strangers in so far as either I genuinely hope either to bring or gain enlightenment or it will entertain me to do so.

As a matter of general policy, I leave anonymous posting on in my journal, and I have IP logging off. But this is so that people who don't yet have LJs can comment, and so my friends can tell me interesting things under cover of anonymity if they need to - I've seen and made interesting use of this possibility so I'm open to it.

Comments

[ciphergoth.livejournal.com]

People can and do feed the trolls. And they gain some satisfaction simply from seeing their comments there. Silent deletion is likely to be most effective.

If they keep posting, I can start screening anonymous comments and barring non-anonymous abusive users.

[babysimon]

Remember Bob Kiley and NYC subway graffiti.

[Graffiti was a huge problem. Bob refused to allow trains out of depots with graffiti on. The cleanup workload was horrendous for a few weeks, then all the graffiti dropped away. No incentive to do it if it gets wiped almost immediately.]