ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] akicif for the heads-up, propogating this one because it's important and fucking scary.
A headline (Government sweeps aside privacy rights) and a leader (British Liberty, RIP) from today's Guardian. It's not just the Police, Intelligence services, and the tax authorities who can get at anyone's telephone and internet communications data without a warrant or court order, but seven Whitehall departments, every local authority in the country, NHS bodies in Scotland and Northern Ireland, and 11 other public bodies ranging from the postal services commission to the food standards agency....

But it seems it's all necessary to continue the War on Terrorism. So that's all right, then.
Unchanged from [livejournal.com profile] akicif's text because I can't improve on how he put it! See also "'Snoop' plans raise privacy fears" (BBC News)

Update and, following [livejournal.com profile] wechsler's example, here's my PGP public key.

Date: 2002-06-11 02:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wechsler.livejournal.com
Remind me to check your journal in the 30 seconds before i updat emine next time ;)

Date: 2002-06-11 02:22 am (UTC)
lovingboth: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lovingboth
Surely Patricia Hewitt, a former general secretary of Liberty, is one who would want to assert the importance of a robust right to privacy?

One of the two authors of the letter to then Labour leader Neil Kinnock saying that being nice to queers frightened off voters, wasn't she?

The fire service can already knock down your house if they feel like it, I really don't see why anyone thinks they should be able to get someone's web browsing habits. I can only imagine it's in there to be removed later as a concession.

If I used an 0845 number to call my co-located PCs, I could be my ISP. Hmmm, I must see if I can become a broadband reseller.

Date: 2002-06-11 02:44 am (UTC)
adjectivegail: (N & J laughing)
From: [personal profile] adjectivegail
But it seems it's all necessary to continue the War on Terrorism. So that's all right, then.
*grin* i love the fact that the Guardian's article says it's to help fight the war on terrorism, and the BBC's one says "Officials say the moves are not a reaction to the US terror attacks."

Date: 2002-06-11 02:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giolla.livejournal.com
Random points:
Time to make sure as much traffic as possible is encrypted at the transport layer as well.

Don't forget to support your local anonymous e-mail/proxy service.

Any idea if crowds is still operational?

I wonder if the public lynx clients will see increased usage.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 1st, 2026 12:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios