QUANTUM COMPUTER PERFORMS FIRST SUCCESSFUL FACTORING
IBM SCIENTISTS BUILD MACHINE THAT SOLVES MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS WITH QUANTUM MECHANICS
NUMBER 15 FACTORED
FACTORS ARE 3 AND 5
http://www.research.ibm.com/resources/news/20011219_quantum.shtml
IBM SCIENTISTS BUILD MACHINE THAT SOLVES MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS WITH QUANTUM MECHANICS
NUMBER 15 FACTORED
FACTORS ARE 3 AND 5
http://www.research.ibm.com/resources/news/20011219_quantum.shtml
no subject
Date: 2001-12-19 03:07 pm (UTC)As I recall, doesn't that mean that cryptography based on the difficulty of factoring is now pretty much pooched?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Gulp.
Date: 2001-12-19 03:16 pm (UTC)But they appear to need a specific design of molecule to get 7 qubits - so this isn't going to scale. I like the quote "The first quantum computing applications would likely to be co-processors" -- as if people were thinking the market was about to be flooded with 1Gqb SIMMs.
But if they do manage to build a 16kqb machine (or however large a box one would need to brute-force RSA), this would lead to some serious asymmetry. We keep hearing about quantum crypto, but AFAIK that requires a special link between computers, and can only be done at the transport layer. Hardly something you can run over IP. Am I right? If so, I would like to wish everyone a happy goldfish bowl, like at the end of the Asimov story...
Re: Gulp.
From:Re: Gulp.
From:Re: Gulp.
From:Re: Gulp.
From:Re: Gulp.
From:Re: Gulp.
From:Re: Gulp.
From:no subject
Date: 2001-12-20 02:59 am (UTC)FACTORS ARE 3 AND 5
Um, so what? I can do that in my head, really quickly.
Shouldn't a quantum computer be inventing FTL travel, and making people's undergarments disappear and reappear at the far side of the unverse, and that sort of thing?
J
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: