Date: 2011-10-17 02:40 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
About half of the UK's national newspapers are actual commercial businesses; about half are run at a loss by charities or as the playthings of influence-peddling millionaires. So eg the Mail, the Sun, the Mirror are actual businesses; the Times, the Independent, the Guardian are not. The Telegraph is an anomaly because it was for years a loss-making part of the Barclay Brothers portfolio but recently went into profit. The accounting legitmacy of that profit is not without its doubters.

The latter will be fine so long as charities and millionaires continue their largesse. The former will disappear or be sold to the latter, probably very suddenly indeed, one fine day when the the three or four ad agencies in London that control the placement of most ads finally decide the money is being wasted and either cut back their offered rate to a commercially unsustainable one or stop altogether.

The idea that "newspapers" as such can move online is pure fiction, the costs of journalism cannot be met out of online revenues. It is slightly conceivable that one or two English-language newspapers will survive in some form purely online out of subscription revenues, but experiments in that direction so far have been utter failures. There is no prospect whatsoever of funding journalism as currently understood out of online ad revenues.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 11:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios