Date: 2010-02-15 12:15 pm (UTC)
Just to reiterate from above: I continue to be grateful for your participation in this discussion and I'm sorry I'm coming across more sharply than I intend. I think we're making progress and I hope I can blunt the sharpness of my tone enough for us to continue without blunting the sharpness of my argument :-)

I think there's a good chance that those frozen in 1982 are information-theoretically dead or otherwise beyond the reach of any plausible future technology, but "infinitesimally small" expresses absolutely *tremendous* confidence, and that seems unwarranted to me.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 10th, 2026 03:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios