LoudTwitter?

[ciphergoth]

I have a Twitter feed, and much of what I post there doesn't get posted here. I tend to assume that there's no point to things like LoudTwitter, because those who like Twitter-style communication will subscribe directly, but I'm willing to be corrected!

[Poll #1382671]

Comments

[elfy.livejournal.com]

honestly? i'm starting to hate twitter. it's probably neat functionality aside, it turned journals of nice people who wrote meaningful and interesting entries into a boring string of meaningless short-sentence posts from twitter. bah!

[babysimon]

Please please please don't use LoudTwitter to post into your main journal. If you can set up an RSS or something that's fine, as long as I can ignore it. I am strongly in favour of keeping the two separate :)

[faerierhona.livejournal.com]

Agreed absolutely - fortunately you can actually post twitter to a customs friends group so people can opt not to see it - if you have a paid account

I'm on the verge fo defriending a few people who simply refuse to either LJ Cut or custom friends group LoudTwitter - they post up to 50 twits a day and all I get is meaningless utterly trite shit on 10 posts in a row around midnight

[weegoddess.livejournal.com]

yes. THIS. I find that I just scroll right past the twitterings. Because I couldn't care less. The short-sentence posts out of context are just noise.

[countess-sophia.livejournal.com]

I'd like to vote for a fifth option: I don't really understand what Twitter is or does.

Soph x

[lilitufire.livejournal.com]

I did find a thingy that at least cut the twits, if not the entire post, but I can't remember where, now, sadly. But it does exist - it's a tweak to the stylesheet on LJ.

[andrewducker]

I don't care - mostly because I can't access Twitter at work, and therefoer feel grouchy whenever I see references to Twitter anywhere :->

[palmer1984.livejournal.com]

I'm going to say yes. I often forget to read twitter, because I don't like it that much, but your posts often contain interesting links and it's a shame to miss them. It would also be good to be able to respond directly in comments!

[runesandmen.livejournal.com]

I have twitter but haven't really got to grips with it, I'm a wee bit too verbose still! ;) x

[http://users.livejournal.com/_lj_sucks_/]

You don't have a mobile phone?

[kake]

Here it is.

[stgpcm.livejournal.com]

Any chance of a example of the kind of stuff we're missing?

[webcowgirl.livejournal.com]

RSS feed yes!

[nickys.livejournal.com]

You really need a tickbox for "Sorry, I lost track of the differences between all these various communications thingies several years ago..." :-)

[valkyriekaren.livejournal.com]

*nods* For me, the main reason to use Twitter is so that my LJ posts will be longer and more interesting because my blabbering and one-liners will be relegated to Twitter!

[wwhyte.livejournal.com]

If LoudTwitter makes one post daily, I quite like it. If it's more than that, meh. I understand it's a bit in flux.

[ex-pipistre.livejournal.com]

I believe they are called 'tweets' but 'twits' seems much more apt!