Date: 2008-03-27 11:03 pm (UTC)
reddragdiva: (Default)
From: [personal profile] reddragdiva
The only sticking point is secure-ish friends lists. On a hostile internet.

Date: 2008-03-28 12:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com
Well, maybe.

http://chipotle.livejournal.com/183056.html?view=702736#t702736 is why I think it's completely wrong.

Date: 2008-03-28 08:33 am (UTC)
andrewducker: (Default)
From: [personal profile] andrewducker
Meh. I'm still happy here.

Date: 2008-03-28 08:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lizw.livejournal.com
This may be worth keeping an eye on. The author worked for LJ until recently.

Date: 2008-03-28 09:44 am (UTC)
juliet: (Default)
From: [personal profile] juliet
If it really had interoperability I might be up for switching earlier than I otherwise would. As has been mentioned before, in several places: the sticking point is that the people I want to talk to are *here*, and writing friends-locked stuff *here*. And there are lots of 'em, so a mass move would be challenging.

(Also I find this a bit depressing because the *other* place I spend time on is also in the middle of liferaft-hunting for slightly different reasons, & it is all making me sad. Wah.)

Date: 2008-03-28 10:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] olethros.livejournal.com
Bingo. The killer feature of lj is the ability to authenticate and authorise people we know, because they're already all on lj. I guess what I really want is selective, encrypted RSS.

Date: 2008-03-28 10:25 am (UTC)
reddragdiva: (Default)
From: [personal profile] reddragdiva
Obvious social problem that springs to mind: I'm imagining getting access to someone's locked posts and having client software that promptly downloads the entire collection of locked posts. These then becoming precious nuggets of information that are hoarded simply because they're locked. The evolutionary response would be blogs with locked posts that disappear after a set time so they can't be downloaded in a lump going back years.

Date: 2008-03-28 10:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
"encrypted" is an optional extra - I'd settle for the same level of security that LJ gives me.

Date: 2008-03-28 01:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hughe.livejournal.com
my raft is called facebook, and i'll disembark as soon as it docks somewhere nice

Date: 2008-03-30 02:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dennyd.livejournal.com
Yeah, my current 'best chance' theory is that Facebook will see LJ are pissing people off, and do some work on their 'notes' system to make it a full(er)-featured journalling system. I noticed that they added custom friends groups and related access-control stuff to the site lately, although I'm not sure how that dovetails with the notes subsystem at present.

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 5th, 2026 10:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios