Date: 2007-10-21 09:44 am (UTC)
adjectivegail: (Default)
Either homeopathy is not particularly effective and so does not need regulation, because the statistical significance that it has a helpful effect is so low; or else it causes measurable and directly attributable effects on the body, in which case surely questions of when to take it and how much to take are important??

I've heard, for example, that echinacea works by stimulating white blood cell response. I have no idea if it's actually true, and a quick google didn't turn up anything to support this. But if it is true then, for example, leukaemia patients, or HIV patients, or patients with systemic lupus, should surely be warned that they should not be taking it, as there'd be contraindications?? This is the kind of thing that regulation would be extremely important for - if, that is, these therapies have any effect. And surely we won't know unless/until rigorous studies are conducted.

Unless/until that happens, I can't help but think that the biggest losers will be the patients - are surely any self-respecting therapist, of any stripe, would want their patients to have the best products and the best chances?
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 07:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios