Volume

May. 23rd, 2003 12:06 pm
ciphergoth: (Default)
[personal profile] ciphergoth
Between the MP3 file and the speakers there are no fewer than seven different volume controls. One is on the MP3 application itself. Two in the Linux kernel, "master" and "PCM". Then it comes out of the sound card and into Kitty's mixer, where it goes past a "gain" dial, a level slider and a crossfader. Finally the amplifier which feeds the speakers has a standard issue dial on the front.

Many of them don't like being right at the top; you have to push them up until it sounds nasty. I get that "all life is misdesigned" feeling.

I have a note in my brain to quote [livejournal.com profile] purplerabbits as saying "You wouldn't want an off-centre badger spinning mechanism!". I have no idea why now, but anyway, there's an item off my TODO list.

Date: 2003-05-23 04:14 am (UTC)
zotz: (Default)
From: [personal profile] zotz
The gain and volume controls have to cope with the fact that there are likely to be a variety of input levels. If you allow enough leeway to play a quiet input at reasonable volume, then you allow the amplifiers to be overdriven from a high input level. I don't think there's any way around it.

The multiplicity of gain and volume controls in that particular system, meanwhile, comes from the fact that the signal's running (for convenience) through more components than it strictly needs to. There's no reason (in principle) why the line out from the computer couldn't go straight to a power amp, apart from that you'd do a lot of plugging and unplugging to use another source. That would cut the number to three.

Date: 2003-05-23 04:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keirf.livejournal.com
My home recording setup has six stages where you can (often inadvertantly) mute the system: mike switch, mixer switchboard in and out, PC soundcard, and two in Cubase. It's very annoying.

Date: 2003-05-23 04:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] selectnone.livejournal.com
You could also add the volume at which the MP3s are encoded, and whether you have your fingers in yours ears in the next room... or not

Date: 2003-05-23 04:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purplerabbits.livejournal.com
Well, you wouldn't, would you? I mean there'd be angry badgers being flung off at all angles...

Date: 2003-05-23 05:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-meta.livejournal.com
I've noticed that about PC sound cards too. The ThinkPad volume control will go up to a level where the sound is horribly distorted. What were they thinking?

(Probably "PC users don't care about quality, let alone sound quality".)

Date: 2003-05-23 06:02 am (UTC)
vampwillow: thinking (thinker)
From: [personal profile] vampwillow
When I used to teach Sound Engineering (for Live Music, Theatre, Recording and Radio!) I used to recommend that people started at around the 70% mark on each fader. Strictly speaking all faders at full should be fine so long as the original signal doesn't over-mod (which for an MP3 or WAV means getting hard limited at 100%) but each stage can raise the level again so can over-mod the imput of the next stage. Thus best value - given that faders are logaritmic not linear - is around 1/sqr(2) ie. 70.7%, as this should give an output level roughly that of the input and hence not add distortion other than that introduced by the electronic components within that mixer/amp stage.
</tech off>

Profile

ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 13th, 2026 10:55 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios