You are not entitled to your opinion

[ciphergoth]

• You Are Never Entitled to Your Opinion
  
• Sorry, but you are not entitled to your opinion
  
• Why You Are Not Entitled To Your Opinion

You are, I think, entitled to the right to hold and express any opinion without being shut down by the State for doing so; that is where the entitlement ends.

[Poll #1410915]
(edit: removed Harlan Ellison quote, which doesn't really express what I'm getting at here)

Comments

[ciphergoth.livejournal.com]

As the second article linked above asks, if there is a right to hold and express an opinion, what duty does that right impose on others?

[hughe.livejournal.com]

by that definition... I think it is the duty of others to allow them to hold and express their opinion, however wrong you may think it may be.

i dont think it is the duty of other people to beleive it, or to not express their own conflicting opinion. I certainly don't think it is other people's duty or responsibility to change the opinions. It may be in their interest to, however.

But I suppose what they are getting at is: If I have an entitlement to the opinion, do I also have pretection over people trying to change it. If you have reasoning behind it then you can compare reasoning and it isn't an issue. Opinions can and should be fluid based on evidence, like scientific theory.

*shrug*

[wildeabandon.livejournal.com]

But what does "allow them to express it" mean? It's not as though any of us have the power to stop people expressing their opinions.

[ciphergoth.livejournal.com]

I'm still having trouble working out what you mean by "I am entitled to my opinion". By "allow", do you mean "not punch them"? If not just that, then what?

[hughe.livejournal.com]

and what do "others" mean? fellow citezens? the government? MI5?

It's more complicated than it sounds. Sounds like there is some balance between them not harrassing others and others not physically asaulting them :)

[ciphergoth.livejournal.com]

and what do "others" mean? fellow citezens? the government? MI5?

Another excellent question you need to answer in order to give the phrase meaning, yes. What duties does it impose, and on whom? Beware of simply chasing the meaninglessness from one phrase to another!

[hughe.livejournal.com]

but I think overall I think people have the right to be wrong. I don't think it puts any duty on anybody else. If they use their wrong and get burned (eg "in my opinion fire is cold") then it was their responsibility to research their opinions before putting them into practice. I don't think it is the goverment's responsibility to tell them fire is hot. Other people may want to, but I dont think it is a duty.

[ciphergoth.livejournal.com]

But the point of the second article is that it's meaningless to posit a "right" that imposes no duty on anyone.