ciphergoth: (Default)
Paul Crowley ([personal profile] ciphergoth) wrote2009-06-04 02:18 pm
Entry tags:

You are not entitled to your opinion

You are, I think, entitled to the right to hold and express any opinion without being shut down by the State for doing so; that is where the entitlement ends.

[Poll #1410915]
(edit: removed Harlan Ellison quote, which doesn't really express what I'm getting at here)

[identity profile] valkyriekaren.livejournal.com 2009-06-04 01:50 pm (UTC)(link)
There are no stupid answers, only stupid people.

What I mean by this is that no answer (or opinion) is ever 'stupid' or 'wrong' provided it can be explained or justified. (Obviously I take as axiomatic that justifying opinions is useful and meaningful, and I think I'd find it troublesome to have a conversation with anyone who didn't.)

So a far as that goes, yes, people are entitled to their opinions, and I'm entitled to think their opinions are wrong or stupid if they can't or won't explain them.

I do think that the phrase, "Well, I'm/you're entitled to my opinion" is mostly used in two ways. Firstly, it's often used belligerently by someone who can't or won't justify themselves, but wants to be heard all the same. Secondly, it's often used in a conciliatory way, when an argument has become unproductive or threatens to become violent or abusive - it's the debating equivalent of, "Leave it, Wayne, he's not worth it!"

At least in the second instance, I can see its value - sometimes it's more important, at least in the short term, to keep the peace than to be right.
Edited 2009-06-04 14:33 (UTC)

[identity profile] robinbloke.livejournal.com 2009-06-04 03:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Sometimes it's more important, at least in the short term, to keep the peace than to be right.

So very true.