ext_120749 ([identity profile] robinbloke.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] ciphergoth 2009-06-04 03:12 pm (UTC)

Brain cogs going...

Fecking LJ comment system. Note to self; write it all in notepad first in future. Bah.

I hadn't any strong thoughts on this ("live and let live" and all that malarky) until I discussed this with a friend and the distinction between this led to the implications of the word "entitled" as a legal phrase.

The issue being the difference between common and Napoleonic (I think it's that) law; the former lists what you are ~not~ allowed to do and the latter lists what you ~are~ allowed to do. In stating you are "entitled" to something it implies that unless you are specifically allowed to do it - you can't; whereas with common law everything is fair game unless it's been outlawed.

I'm all for hearing opinions of people, but if said opinion is libelous or incorrect (Remember PI == 3? ah fun...) then you may be able to believe in it, think it, but express it and you could be in a whole heap of trouble.

Plus it's a bit of a cop out.

Mind you I'm still mulling this one over!

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org