Paul Crowley (
ciphergoth) wrote2009-02-18 11:03 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Mathematics poll
Inspired by a similar poll in
palmer1984's journal.
About the "proof" question below: examples of the kind of proof I mean would be a proof that there are infinitely many primes, or that the square root of two is irrational, or of Pythagoras's Theorem. A proof in computer science counts too. By "know a proof off by heart" I mean that you'd be able to convince someone of it at a party, if they had the background to follow the proof.
If you know lots of proofs, feel free to choose one you particularly like in the last question...
[Poll #1351621]
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
About the "proof" question below: examples of the kind of proof I mean would be a proof that there are infinitely many primes, or that the square root of two is irrational, or of Pythagoras's Theorem. A proof in computer science counts too. By "know a proof off by heart" I mean that you'd be able to convince someone of it at a party, if they had the background to follow the proof.
If you know lots of proofs, feel free to choose one you particularly like in the last question...
[Poll #1351621]
no subject
no subject
Putative symbol-lists (whether you want to think of them as numbers or otherwise) that cannot in principle be expressed, are not expressed anywhere. In that sense they clearly do not exist.
A movie on my hard disk takes up about 1 GB, i.e. it's an 8,000,000,000 digit long binary number. Do all such numbers "exist"? I submit that the only ones that exist, are those that actually have physical representations somewhere; to say otherwise is to say that a movie exists before filming has started on it, which IMO is ridiculous.
I think you think you're doing something terribly important and clever
No, I think it's bloody obvious.
no subject