ext_2941 ([identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] ciphergoth 2009-01-08 03:53 pm (UTC)

I do use the principle of induction, even though it can't be rationally justified; that's why I call it an axiom. The same thing goes for the assumption that thinking is any good.

I'm slightly at a loss - I can't now see how you can't see that your justification of the principle is circular.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org