Paul Crowley (
ciphergoth) wrote2008-08-03 11:03 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Ask an atheist
In a discussion about religion in
wildeabandon's journal,
meihua writes: "this seems to have turned into me interrogating you. [...] Is there anything you'd like to challenge me on, instead?"
I think it's only fair enough to open up my own beliefs to the challenges of others, since I'm always keen to respond when theists invite me to give my perspective on some aspect of their beliefs as
wildeabandon has in a series of recent posts. So, is there anything you'd like me to respond to?
Rules:
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I think it's only fair enough to open up my own beliefs to the challenges of others, since I'm always keen to respond when theists invite me to give my perspective on some aspect of their beliefs as
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Rules:
- You don't have to read this thread. This post is an invitation, not a challenge; if you don't like to read me talking about this then feel free to skip this.
- Be honest. Please don't advance arguments you don't personally buy, unless you're also an atheist and you want to discuss how best to counter it.
- If you come to change your mind about the validity of an argument, think about how you can generalise the lesson learned so as not to misassess similar arguments in future.
- Don't just match the politeness of what you reply to, but try to exceed it - see Postel's Law. Otherwise it is very easy to end up with a thread where each contributor thinks they are merely matching the snark level of the other, and yet the thread starts with the very slightest suggestion of rudeness and finishes with "please choke on a bucket of cocks".
no subject
That doesn't mean jokes about religion can't be allowed. I like SinFest (http://www.sinfest.net/), for example. It might be interesting to think about what's the difference between the two.
I don't know Greta Christina's work and I'm due out the door for something else basically right now without time to read it and form a real opinion. I do notice, in a glance at the front page of her Web log, that she has a bold headline asking "DO BELIEVERS REALLY BELIEVE WHAT THEY SAY THEY BELIEVE?" and I wonder how many atheists would be happy to have the same question asked about atheists and answered in the negative by theists discussing it among themselves without, y'know, asking the atheists.
no subject
I can also think that someone's beliefs are rather silly, while still respecting them. There is a difference between saying "all Christians are idiots" and saying "Christian views are very silly".
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
This is an approach that some atheists use - though it has the problem that a Christian can say that how other Christians behave doesn't mean all of them are like it. (Wouldn't criticising Christians' behaviour, as opposed to criticising a belief they hold, be more likely to piss them off...?)
or especially why atheists are a group you want to be part of, would be a very good start on how to talk to theists about atheism without pissing them off.
But I don't see atheism as any kind of group, it's just a description of me. Even if I thought every other atheist on the planet was a complete arsehole, I'd still be an atheist (possibly I might decide not to identify with the label atheism, but it wouldn't change my views on God - indeed, there do appear to be plenty of people who freely admit they don't believe in God, but avoid identifying as an "atheist").
no subject
That said, many of the atheists I know are quite witty, with varying degrees of "evangelicalness," so I do wind up hanging out with them by default - I don't pick them because that's how they believe, but the people I choose to spend time with frequently feel the same way I do about religion, but with differing degrees of enthusiasm.
no subject
no subject
If I thought all Christians were like that, I wouldn't be one — and indeed wasn't for the longest time because the vocal Christians tend (unfortunately, but fairly naturally) to be the ones with the most extreme, most unpalatable views. They also wouldn't consider me to be a Christian anyway (which I should probably take as a compliment)!
no subject