ext_3375: Banded Tussock (Default)
Nile ([identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] ciphergoth 2007-12-31 01:30 pm (UTC)

A dangerous oversimplification...


Geographic spread. Getting 10% of the vote in every single seat in the United Kingdom equals zero seats. Getting 33% of the vote, evenly spread across the UK, means winning the tiny fraction of seats where the other two parties are evenly split at 32.9% and some independent candidate loses his deposit without taking your votes... A particular concern when the largest small party are the Greens, who eat disproportionately into the Lib Dem vote.

My point is that the major parties are geographically-concentrated: the Conservatives dominate in suburban constituencies with a golf course, and in most of England's rural seats; Labour dominate in inner-city constituencies and win elections by displacing the Conservatives from suburban seats in Northern England. When they fail to do this, we get a Conservative majority in Parliament.

The Lib-Dems have a presence everywhere but they only have the critical mass of 'core vote' in a small geographical concentration of constituencies in South-Western England - and in Scotland, where the Conservative party have been squeezed out entirely and the election's a three-way contest between Labour, the Lib-Dems, and the Scots Nationalists.

The tiny fraction of three-way marginal seats where the Lib Dems have a significant core vote are 'battleground' seats for the two major parties, too: winning elections is about taking marginals. Needless to say, massive resources are poured into these local contests and predicting results is more of an art than a science.

An affluent inner-city area like Islington would be a good example: Labour and the Conservatives can rely on an 'Ignorant Vote' among the housing projects and the old age pensioners respectively; the election is decided among a tiny fraction of floating voters among the 'chattering classes', most of whom will have been indoctrinated into an unchanging political stance at university and, as adults, live among like-minded friends and will only consume news media that confirm their existing prejudices. Making headway against such entrenched positions is a Sisyphean task, and it may well be that the long-term Lib-Dem strategy will be to expand from it's geographical base rather than waste resources campaigning as a 'third party' in the marginals.


Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org