ext_78841 ([identity profile] pavlos.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] ciphergoth 2003-03-08 07:43 am (UTC)

Why? Presumably the employees are obliged to keep confidential what the news network knows and does. Unless the network is asking them to do something unlawful or very harmful to the public, in which case whistle-blowing should be protected.

You could argue that the behaviour is very harmful to the public, or perhaps that the network misled the journalist when they hired him, by not explaining that they lie routinely about the news.

Pavlos

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org